About This Blog

This blog is published as an offering of topics that may be of interest to Ridgefield residents in the hope that it will spark some dialog about important issues that face us as a community.

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

My Foray in Local Politics (2 of 3)


Each of five Board of Selectmen candidates was asked what he or she hoped to accomplish if elected.

Andy Bodner, an incumbent Republican and former finance board member, said that over the years he’d been in office the town undertook a school building program to address space problems.

“We had inadequacies in our schools, our infrastructure was under attack,” he said. “A lot of money was spent, taxes went up quite a bit.”

Now, he said, the focus should be on “efficiency,” not expansion of services. “The bad economy and taxes are a concern,” he said. “Ridgefield is a special town. We don’t want to see it changed.”

He also spoke of the selectmen’s efforts to buy the 45-acre Schlumberger property and keep it from development as high density housing.

“Schlumberger is going to be a major issue,” he said.

His priorities are “improve roads, maintain education, and avoid turning Ridgefield in a large apartment housing development,” he said.

Maureen Kozlark, a Republican recently elected to fill a vacant seat on the board, added a $5-million contribution to the library’s $20-million project to her priorities.

“My goals going forward on the Board of Selectmen are maintain an appropriate level of taxes on the people,” she began. “Schlumberger … the library expansion is on the horizon and that’s going to be something we’ll be debating and hopefully supporting,” she said. “The library is one of our most used assets.

“Schools,” she added. “People move to Ridgefield for the quality of the schools…

“We want to maintain our small town feel, but be metropolitan in a way that we can enjoy the arts,” she said.

Democrat and longtime board member Barbara Manners said, “I want to see us owning the Schlumberger property.”

She spoke of “public private partnerships” that had combined taxpayer money with donor contribution to get big things done.

“Tiger Hollow is a great example, The Playhouse is a great example,” said Ms. Manners, who helped launch the creation of the playhouse.

“Now we have an opportunity to build a new library,” she said. “All those things add to the quality of life in this town.”

Incumbent Selectman Di Masters, a Democrat, said that while “Schlumberger is very important,” one of her main goals is to affect the way young people like the students in the audience looked at public service and public officials.

“The reasons I’ve been an elected official all my life is for civics,” she said. “People don’t get into public office for nefarious reasons. They do it for the good reasons.”

“I hope I can be an example to you as a public official,” she said. “That’s what I’d like to leave the town.”

Jan Rifkinson, an unaffiliated candidate for the Board of Selectmen who isn’t an officeholder, said, “I’m the outsider up here. All these people are on the Board of Selectmen. They’re incumbents, I’m trying to take one of their seats.”

Mr. Rifkinson described beginning to attend Board of Selectmen meetings three or four years ago, and trying to learn about the issues. “I started to ask a lot of questions — question after question after question. It became kind of a joke,” he said. “Sometimes they were explained to me satisfactorily, sometimes they weren’t.”

As a result his goals if elected include “greater transparency in government and more involvement of the general population,” he said.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

CT's unemployment rate is down but the devil is in the details


The state Department of Labor announced Monday that Connecticut's unemployment rate has decreased to 8.7 percent, which is the lowest rate since Sept. 2009, according to the Hartford Courant.
In addition, 6,500 jobs were created by state employers in October and the number of jobs in the state overall has grown by 8,800 in 2011, according to preliminary figures.

The state's unemployment rate decreased to 8.9 percent in September, marking the first time that the rate has fallen below 9 percent in two years. According to the CT Post, October marks the second straight month of decline in the state's unemployment rate.

Anyone need a job?

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Why vote for an unaffiliated candidate?

Who am I, what do I stand for, why am I campaigning for a seat on the Board of Selectmen?

I’m a retired, middle class married guy living on a fixed income, financially squeezed like many of you.

Philosophically, I’m for transparency in government, full disclosure and working more closely with Ridgefielders.

Fiscally, I’m careful. I want to understand the reasons for spending and exactly how that spending will benefit the taxpayer. I believe more revenue streams must be developed to reduce the tax burden.

People move here not only for our excellent schools, but because both housing and taxes are lower by comparison to other Fairfield towns in our category. If that formula changes, Ridgefield’s charm will change. I am not in favor of that.

I love new ideas. I like to converse with people. I admire thoughtful individuals with common sense.

I am not politically driven, which is why I made a conscious decision to run as an unaffiliated candidate.

Demagoguery, dogma and political gamesmanship don’t belong in Ridgefield.

Someone willing to volunteer their time for the community, running for a seat on the Board of Selectmen as I am, should understand the town’s major issues. I attended almost all board meetings for the past four years and I can say that I am knowledgeable about those issues.

If I am elected, I may not always get it right, but I’m sure going to do my best to balance the interests of everyone in the entire community.

Press endorsements in election



Ridgefield is great place, and doing remarkably well considering how tough the economic times are — a 1% tax increase last year. The four incumbents on the Board of Selectmen deserve re-election: two Democrats, Barbara Manners, who has done so much for the arts and to enrich community life in town, and Di Masters, the community center director and a former Planning and Zoning chair; and two Republicans, Andy Bodner, the board’s house skeptic and numbers man, and Maureen Kozlark, the moderate longtime school board veteran.

That said, Jan Rifkinson, the unaffiliated petitioning candidate, deserves credit and the town’s thanks for making a contest of it and running a clean issue-oriented campaign.
[...]

The Numbers > 2011 Town Elections

First Selectman Total
Rudy Marconi (D) 3552
Board of Selectmen Total
Di Masters (D) 2786
Barbara Manners (D) 2936
Andrew Bodner (R) 3085
Maureen Kozlark (R) 2866
Jan Rifkinson (U)
1324
Town Clerk Total
Barbara Serfilippi (R) 3537
Town Treasurer Total
Maureen Kiernan (R) 3498
Tax Collector Total
Jane Berendsen-Hill (R) 3256
Board of Finance Total
Jessica Mancini (D) 2798
Steven Coury (R) 1866
Paul Sutherland (D) 2331
John Palermo (R) 2253
David Ulmer (D) 2638
Board of Education Total
Adeline Merrill (D) 2468
Linda Lavelle (R) 2335
Karen Sulzinsky (D) 2549
Michael Raduazzo (R) 2554
Richard Steinhart (R) 2824
Austin Drukker (R) 2945
Christopher Murray (R) 2474
Board of Assessment Appeals Total
Robert Lavelle (R) 2656
Planning and Zoning Total
Philip Mische (D) 2747
Peter Chipouras (R) 2856
Patrick Walsh (R) 3124
John Katz (R) 2952
George Hanlon (R) 2 years 3040
Zoning Board of Appeals
(5 years, 2011)
Total
Duane C. Barney (R) 2862
Zoning Board of Appeals
(5 years, 2012)
Total
Sky Cole (D) 1588
David J. Choplinski (R) 2022
Zoning Board of Appeals
(One year)
Total
David J. Choplinski (R) 2413
Zoning Board of Appeals
(5 years, 2011)
Total
Sky Cole (D) 1247
Michael S. Stenko (R) 2125
Zoning Board of Appeals
(Four years)
Total
Sky Cole (D) 1698
Police Commissioners Total
Joseph I. Adams, Jr. (D) 1493
Charles A. Knoche (R) 2738
George F. Cain (D) 2597
 

Faint praise from the opposition > A valid candidate says Susan Coco

No challenge for top spot in Ridgefield

Updated 11:35 p.m., Friday, November 4, 2011
RIDGEFIELD -- Even in Connecticut, the Land of Steady Habits, this town is the soul of political stability.

It votes on the top town officials only every four years, rather than every two years. And this year, when the Republicans had a chance to challenge First Selectman Rudy Marconi after his 12 years in office, they chose to pass.

Marconi is running unopposed, ensuring he'll be first selectman until at least 2015.

Nor did the Republicans even try to pick up a third seat on the Board of Selectmen. Instead, the four incumbents -- Democrats Di Masters and Barbara Manners and Republicans Andrew Bodnar and Maureen Kozlark -- are facing their only challenge from petitioning candidate Jan Rifkinson.

Rifkinson said he finds the lack of competition in town "pretty distressing.'' His candidacy, he said, offers the voters at least one choice in the selectmen's race.

"When you serve too long, the knife can get a little dull,'' he said of the incumbents.

Democratic Town Chairman Susan Cocco called Rifkinson a valid candidate.

"He's certainly on the ballot," she said. But Cocco then quickly praised Marconi and the four selectmen, Democrats and Republicans alike, saying they offer the town proven leadership. [...]

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Schlumberger - Another IBM fiasco? > Letter to the Editor Ridgefield Press 2011/07/21

Written by Jan Rifkinson

What's happening with the Schlumberger property?
 
It's hard to know because all relevant discussions are carried out in secret, Board of Selectmen executive sessions.

There are no minutes or recordings of these sessions. What decisions emerge, and come before the electorate, will be fait accompli.


In my opinion strategic thinking is not necessarily the hallmark of this board so will those decisions be in our best interests?


The Schlumberger situation should be important to all of us but it isn't getting any public traction.


Here's what we do know. There is a vacant corporate park, including a vacant Philip Johnson building sitting on 45 acres in the midst of Ridgefield.


Schlumberger has notified Ridgefield of it's intention to demolish the buildings and, when land values rise, they  will sell the 45 acres to.... whom.... for what? Only five people know the answers.


How will what the BoS decides about this 45 acres impact us 10-20 years from now? Or are we taking a short view?


Do we want another Casagmo? How about another Fox Hill?

Would we be willing to give Schlumberger a $214,166.80 (what they pay now) tax exemption to help preserve the space for Ridgefield going forward while we try to work out a sensible plan?

How about turning town hall into a privately owned boutique hotel & moving the entire administration to the Johnson building? How about selling the Venus building? Maybe we could save millions by moving the Police station into that complex. Or would we prefer to have 45 acres of open space with another museum?


These are all questions that I can't answer but I do think the public should be part of the discussion.


We are now living with the results of the IBM fiasco. I don't want to be part of another one. How about you?

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Rifkinson will run, seeks signatures > Ridgefield Press July 20,2011


Rifkinson will run, seeks signatures


Jan Rifkinson
Jan Rifkinson is in. He’s decided to run for a seat on the Board of Selectmen.

“I have indeed decided to make this run as an unaffiliated candidate,” said Mr. Rifkinson, a frequent critic of town government who has been seeking feedback for a couple of weeks on the idea of running for a board seat — and announced his interest in the idea in last week’s Press.

“I’m filing my papers today,” he said Tuesday. “That’s without any guarantees from anybody for anything. I have no assurance of any kind from any of the parties that they will endorse me, or cross endorse me, or side endorse me...
“I’m just going out on my own,” he said. “It’s just me.” 
Because he plans to run unaffiliated, Mr. Rifkinson has some work to do to get on the ballot.
“First thing is you get an application for a nominating petition — not part of a party — and then I get this filled out, with the help of the town clerk,” he said. “And then it gets sent off to Hartford, to the elections office.”
The state elections office then computes the number of valid signatures of registered Ridgefield voters — of any party affiliation — he’ll need to sign a petition in support of his being placed on the ballot.
“They send me a letter of acknowledgment that they’ve received my petition, and then they tell me how many names I’ll need on a petition to become a candidate.”
The number of valid signatures needed is one percent of the number of votes cast for the office of selectmen in the previous general election.
In the winter, when Maureen Kozlark petitioned to get on the special election ballot as an unaffiliated candidate after losing the Republican caucus to Marty Heiser, she needed 59 signatures — 1% of the 5,844 votes cast for selectmen in the 2007 election.
Whatever the number, Mr. Rifkinson was optimistic — 1% is [sic] a low threshold.
“It couldn’t be more than 150, because there’s only 15,000 registered voters in town,” he said.
“The entire process has to completed by Aug. 10. It all has to be in to and confirmed by the Town Clerk by Aug. 10. So, I don’t have a whole lot of time.
“I have to have an official form, and then I guess I’ll go stand somewhere and, hopefully, people will sign it,” he said.
People don’t have to plan on voting for him to sign the petition to get him on the ballot.
“I hope people will sign it just on general principle, whether they’ll support me or not. It’s an exercise in democracy,” he said.
Mr. Rifkinson said, “I continue to get comments both privately and publicly that I should run. And it seems to be from a wide swath of the community,” he said.
He has no qualms about doing it the hard way.
“I suppose the conventional thinking is that if I were to run from a party platform I would stand a better chance, and that’s probably true. But I’m just not comfortable doing it,” he said.
“I don’t want anybody calling me or saying to me ‘Don’t support that’ or ‘Do support that’ or ‘If you don’t support that, I’m not going to support you.
“People have written to me,” he added. “They say they’re tired of politics as usual.”
He may not have a party, but he does plan to make his voice heard.
“Oh, yeah, I’m going to run a campaign,” he said. “Certainly I have to sit down with people who know what they’re doing along those lines, because I’ve never been through one of these before.
“I guess, try to find a campaign manager, try to raise some cash, get my face out there, talk to people so they get to know me — and keep my fingers crossed.”
While he’s not going to run on any party’s platform, he said, he wouldn’t mind if the Independent Party, or even one of the major parties, decided to support him.
“Anybody can endorse me, that’s up to them. I’d accept anybody’s endorsement,” he said.
“All three of them can endorse me, as far as I’m concerned.
Mr. Rifkinson said he wasn’t ready to detail the topics he’d be campaigning on, but he had sense of what he wanted to talk about.
“I have a lot of thoughts about that,” he said. “I suppose open government, more transparency, more, more public meetings, more cooperation between the boards...
“I’m hoping people can come around to dealing with issues from a common sense and common good point of view, instead of a political point of view,” he said.
“It should be interesting."

Monday, July 18, 2011

Rifkinson May Run > Ridgefield Press July 16, 2011


Rifkinson may run

Jan Rifkinson
Jan Rifkinson
Time to stop throwing tomatoes and take a turn in the stocks?

Outspoken town government critic Jan Rifkinson is considering a run this fall as an unaffiliated candidate for a seat on the Board of Selectmen.

“I’m still sort of betwixt and between, but I’m really seriously thinking about it,” Mr. Rifkinson said in an interview Tuesday.  “I’m considering running unaffiliated, just plain unaffiliated,” he said.

Mr. Rifkinson, a retired television news producer, said he wasn’t interested in running as a candidate of either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party.
He was skeptical but hadn’t closed the door on a nomination by Ridgefield’s Independent Party.
In writings on his blog Mr. Rifkinson traces his unease with party affiliations to his career in the news business, where reporters, editors and producers were eager to guard their independence of thought.
Mr. Rifkinson attends most selectmen’s and some meetings of other town agencies. He speaks out for taxpayers, and is skeptical of school spending. Two years ago he rose repeatedly to speak at the annual town meeting, on a mission to make First Selectman Rudy Marconi explain the use of and need for every pick-up and dump truck in the budget.
In his blog and on various online venues he contributes to, such as The Ridgefield Forum on The Press’s Web site, Mr. Rifkinson has been asking people what they think of him seeking office.
“I’ve just been talking to people, just individually,” he said, “...to get a sense of what they think, not so much to get a sense of my running as an unaffiliated, but my running at all, in terms of my usefulness.”
It’s something he wonders about.
“The question I’m trying to evolve for myself is whether I can do more good as part of a loyal opposition, or whether or not I can be of any use were I elected to the board,” he said.
In December, when the selectmen were appointing someone to the vacancy left by Joan Plock’s resignation from the board, Mr. Rifkinson joined Republicans Marty Heiser and Maureen Kozlark in interviewing for the seat.
“I thought I was treated pretty shabbily, not because they didn’t select me, just the way they went about business,” he said.
Mr. Rifkinson sat out the subsequent Heiser-Kozlark special election.
Many people who’ve read his blogs and periodic opinion pieces in The Press have suggested he run, Mr. Rifkinson said.
He believes the public has an appetite for candidates outside the two-party politics-as-usual mainstream, and says an unaffiliated candidacy shouldn’t be dismissed as a hopeless long shot.
“I’m just not interested in wasting my time,” he said. “If I run it’s not an exercise in freedom of speech, or to make a point, it’s to win.”