My Foray into Local Politics (3 of 3)

Library, Schlumberger , cell tower: Selectmen candidates take stands

By Macklin Reid, Press Staff on October 29, 2011 in Politics & Elections 

Unanimous in support of the $7-million Schlumberger purchase, selectmen candidates at the recent League of Women Voters debate showed a broad range of opinions when asked about the library’s building plans.

Library

Nearing its $15 million private fund raising goal, the library board plans to ask the town for the final $5 million needed for a $20 million renovation and expansion project.

An audience of about 50 heard candidates discuss the plan at Monday’s League of Women Voters event in the playhouse.

“The 500-pound gorilla in the room is town debt,” said Jan Rifkinson, the unaffiliated candidate challenging four incumbents for a Board of Selectmen’s seat.

Even without more borrowing, the town’s more than $90 million in long-term debt won’t be paid down until 2031, Mr. Rifkinson said.

“My personal feeling is, if the library can raise $10 million, it can do a fine job building a $10-million library. If they raise $15 million, they can do a fine job building a $15-million library.

“I don’t feel we’re in a position to offer them a $5-million gift,” Mr. Rifkinson said.

The case for backing the library’s expansion with $5 million was made most forcefully by board’s two Republican incumbents, Andy Bodner and Maureen Kozlark.

“The Ridgefield Library is an asset to the town,” Mr. Bodner said, and draws “over 1,000 people a day.”

The library is already semi-public. “The town funds 75% of its budget,” he said.

The library building is in need of basic maintenance repairs, which would cost the town about $5 million.

With the library proposal, the town can have a new $20-million library “for what the town would spend to simply patch the building together,” Mr. Bodner said. “I think it would be foolish not to.”

“The building is an older building and it does need repair,” said Ms. Kozlark.

“We’re talking about heating, air conditioning, mechanicals, roof repair … We’ll have to put money into that building anyway,” she said.

“As a town,” she added, “we’ve learned the lesson of delayed maintenance.”

The board’s two Democrats sounded more cautious.

Barbara Manners praised the library board’s fund-raising efforts, and its sale of the former Webster Bank building to Valerie Jensen who hopes to return it to its original use as the town’s movie house. But she was noncommittal about giving the library $5 million for the project, admitting to “reservations” on whether the library could control “operating expenses” at a new, larger building.

“I support taking this to referendum and letting the people decide,” Ms. Manners said.

Di Masters said, “A public private partnership is a remarkable thing, and it should be applauded.”

But she promised to scrutinize the library board’s plans carefully. “When it come to us, we will be charged with asking the tough questions on operating expenses,” she said.

Schlumberger

On the proposed $7 million Schlumberger purchase, the candidates all supported buying the 45-acre site to fend off potential high density housing. Their positions were distinguished largely by nuances.

“Forty-five acres with sewer and water and access is just a recipe for changing the way we do business.” Ms. Masters said.

She thought the town should buy the property, so it can exert stronger control over what it is built there.

“We want tax-positive development,” she said.

Mr. Bodner, too, spoke of the “risk of high density housing” on the site.

“I think we should purchase it, and as quickly as we can sell off pieces to recover costs,” he said.

“There’s definitely economic value,” he said. “I think we can quickly recover the cost.”

Once the town owns the site, Ms. Manners said, “we can have discussions about what kind of specs and controls we want to have” on the land before reselling portions of — while possibly keeping some for future town uses.

“I actually think it’s imperative that we buy that property,” said Ms. Manners.

“By the town purchasing the property we’d be masters of our own destiny,” Ms. Kozlark agreed.

Mr. Rifkinson backed the purchase. “I think we should take control of this property,” he said.

But he raised concerns.

“It’s going to increase our debt,” he warned. “Buying the property is only half the issue, the other half is the carrying costs, going forward.”

Cell Tower

After Tropical Storm Irene’s problems, should the town should try again to improve cell telephone service in north Ridgefield?

“I supported a cell tower in northern Ridgefield before Irene,” Barbara Manners said. “We lost a very good opportunity.”

With the first plan for a cell tower above Ledges Road voted down, she wasn’t sure it made sense to try again.

“We had a town meeting” she said, “and the people who support the cell tower did not come out.”

Di Masters agreed.

“The cell tower was unfortunately a hot-button issue with the neighbors,” Ms. Kozlark said.

The plan was attractive because it would improve cell service while adding 29 acres of open space land. “It could also have protected that ridge line,” she said.

Mr. Bodner most forcefully supported the cell tower.

“It’s absolutely inexcusable in the 21st Century the northern part of town does not have cell phone coverage,” he said. “I think we have to continue to look for alternative sites.”

Mr. Rifkinson offered his thoughts on what the selectmen had done wrong, leading to the defeat of the cell tower.

“Government brings forth some plans and says: ‘vote yes or no.’ It’s a problem in presentation,” Mr. Rifkinson said. “The voters should be brought in right in the beginning.”

My Foray in Local Politics (2 of 3)

Each of five Board of Selectmen candidates was asked what he or she hoped to accomplish if elected.

Andy Bodner, an incumbent Republican and former finance board member, said that over the years he’d been in office the town undertook a school building program to address space problems.

“We had inadequacies in our schools, our infrastructure was under attack,” he said. “A lot of money was spent, taxes went up quite a bit.”

Now, he said, the focus should be on “efficiency,” not expansion of services. “The bad economy and taxes are a concern,” he said. “Ridgefield is a special town. We don’t want to see it changed.”

He also spoke of the selectmen’s efforts to buy the 45-acre Schlumberger property and keep it from development as high density housing.

“Schlumberger is going to be a major issue,” he said.

His priorities are “improve roads, maintain education, and avoid turning Ridgefield in a large apartment housing development,” he said.

Maureen Kozlark, a Republican recently elected to fill a vacant seat on the board, added a $5-million contribution to the library’s $20-million project to her priorities.

“My goals going forward on the Board of Selectmen are maintain an appropriate level of taxes on the people,” she began. “Schlumberger … the library expansion is on the horizon and that’s going to be something we’ll be debating and hopefully supporting,” she said. “The library is one of our most used assets.

“Schools,” she added. “People move to Ridgefield for the quality of the schools…

“We want to maintain our small town feel, but be metropolitan in a way that we can enjoy the arts,” she said.

Democrat and longtime board member Barbara Manners said, “I want to see us owning the Schlumberger property.”

She spoke of “public private partnerships” that had combined taxpayer money with donor contribution to get big things done.

“Tiger Hollow is a great example, The Playhouse is a great example,” said Ms. Manners, who helped launch the creation of the playhouse.

“Now we have an opportunity to build a new library,” she said. “All those things add to the quality of life in this town.”

Incumbent Selectman Di Masters, a Democrat, said that while “Schlumberger is very important,” one of her main goals is to affect the way young people like the students in the audience looked at public service and public officials.

“The reasons I’ve been an elected official all my life is for civics,” she said. “People don’t get into public office for nefarious reasons. They do it for the good reasons.”

“I hope I can be an example to you as a public official,” she said. “That’s what I’d like to leave the town.”

Jan Rifkinson, an unaffiliated candidate for the Board of Selectmen who isn’t an officeholder, said, “I’m the outsider up here. All these people are on the Board of Selectmen. They’re incumbents, I’m trying to take one of their seats.”

Mr. Rifkinson described beginning to attend Board of Selectmen meetings three or four years ago, and trying to learn about the issues. “I started to ask a lot of questions — question after question after question. It became kind of a joke,” he said. “Sometimes they were explained to me satisfactorily, sometimes they weren’t.”

As a result his goals if elected include “greater transparency in government and more involvement of the general population,” he said.

My Foray into Local Politics (1 of 3)

Selectmen candidates explain their stands

By The Ridgefield Press on November 7, 2011 in Politics & Elections 

Schlumberger, the library, debt, budgets, priorities — serious issues face the town and selectmen candidates staked out their positions in response to questions from The Press.

Five candidates are competing for four open Board of Selectmen seats in Tuesday’s town election. The race features four incumbents — Republicans Andrew Bodner and Maureen Kozlark, and Democrats Barbara Manners and Di Masters — and an unaffiliated petitioning candidate, Jan Rifkinson, who has regularly attended and voiced opinions at selectmen’s and other town meetings in recent years.

For first selectman, Democratic incumbent Rudy Marconi will be on the ballot unopposed, so he was not asked to answer the questions.

The questions and answers the candidates provided, within word limits, follow.

What would your top five priorities be as a selectman?

Manners: Schlumberger, Schlumberger, Schlumberger.

Revisiting a possible regulation to restrict the ground floor of Main Street to retail businesses.

Encouraging Branchville’s planned growth to bring more retail and commercial to Ridgefield.

Ensuring the preservation of essential services that relate to townspeople’s health, safety and welfare.

Maintaining Ridgefield’s character and charm.

Kozlark: To sustain and improve Ridgefield’s residents’ quality of life.

To deliver services within our budgets to provide a high quality education.

To preserve our small town historical charm while adding to the commercial tax  base.

To continue efforts in maintaining infrastructure.

To work closely with town organizations on environmental/conservation initiatives.

Rifkinson: Greater government transparency.

Develop cost center accounting for every agency, property, charity and leisure pursuit.

Hire a professional labor relations firm to negotiate all labor contracts with Board of Finance consultation.

Replace agency wish lists with creative long-term planning

Strategic economic development must become a priority to help homeowners.

Bodner: Maintain the current level of municipal services and high quality educational school system, finish negotiating new labor contracts with health care and pension changes per fire contract, adequately address road and other  infrastructure needs, and prevent high density housing at Schlumberger. And, of  course, keep taxes reasonable.

Masters: I want to continue to help lead Ridgefield through these economically challenging times. I remain committed to preserving the quality of life that brings and keeps us in Ridgefield, through economic development and long-range planning, Schlumberger property, balance services and budgets, investment in our kids and community.

With close to $99 million in outstanding debt, where do you stand on prospective additions to the debt burden like $7 million to buy the Schlumberger property and perhaps $5 million toward the library’s $20-million expansion?

Manners: The Schlumberger acquisition is a financially smart move. The character of the town in future years is heavily dependent on that property’s controlled development. Forty-five acres in the town’s center for future commercial, residential, and municipal needs enables us to plan, not merely to react. The library should be decided at referendum.

Kozlark: The Schlumberger property is 45 acres centrally located which is serviced by town water and sewer. It has the potential of being developed as a high-density residential parcel. If this occurs there would be a significant strain on town services. I feel it is important for the town to purchase and control the development of this property.

The library building is in need of mechanical repairs so the town will have to spend money on the building under any scenario. An investment toward a new building makes sense with most of the cost borne by private donations.

Rifkinson: Our financial discussions must be long term, complete, transparent and anchored in Ridgefield’s economic reality.

Currently we are one of Connecticut’s most indebted towns. With no future capital debt (an impossibility), the $99 million we now owe can’t be paid off before 2031.

So here’s where I stand:

Ridgefield should increase its debt beyond the norm only as a last resort and only for something that would otherwise endanger the entire community.

The Schlumberger proposal presents that possibility but the library expansion certainly does not so I would not support a $5-million gift for its expansion at this time.

Bodner: The library has a leaking roof and other major structural issues that the town must address. If, for the same town cost of band-aiding the problems and still having a substandard facility, $15 million of private donations allows the  construction of a brand new library without increasing the annual operating expenses, then I support the initiative.

Leaving 45 acres of developable high density housing in the center of town is risky. Assuming that Schlumberger takes responsibility for the environmental issues, I support the purchase. Additionally, I believe that most of the purchase price can be recovered through controlled land sales.

Masters:The 45-acre Schlumberger property with town water, sewer and access to town assets is ideally suited for many tax positive development opportunities if the town acquires the property and is then able to deed restrict and guide the development of this centrally located acreage. Unbridled development on 45 acres in the center of Ridgefield with many hundreds of additional cars will dramatically change the business as usual in Ridgefield into the future. Daily business will forever be less convenient if the highest density is realized on that parcel. I support the purchase of Schlumberger. Library has done a great job.

What do you think the town should do about roads like many of those in Ridgefield Lakes that are technically private but function as public streets?

Manners: Ridgefield provides some maintenance and plowing on the private roads which have never met town standards and were constructed to be private. Bringing them to code requires vast sums for roadwork as well as legal costs associated with “taking” footage from people’s lawns. It would be better if homeowners through the Lake Association were to assume responsibility for bringing their roads to code. Then Ridgefield could then adopt them and all maintenance associated with them.

Kozlark: The Board of Selectmen have asked the head of our highway department to update us on the status of repairing our existing roads, number of miles of private roads in town, the current condition of these private roads and the estimated dollars needed to address this situation. After I have all this information, I will be able to make an informed decision about maintenance of these private roads.

Rifkinson: This problem is the result of inconsistency.

Only public roads should be serviced at taxpayer expense. That includes patching, gutter work, snow removal and bus service.

Because of a lack of transparency, some private roads have received town services in the past which are now threatened. Residents on these roads are confused and frustrated.

The selectmen must clarify the inconsistency and decide to adopt those private roads or charge for the services provided to them.

Bodner: Assess what the cost of upgrading the private roads into public roads would be, and then see whether a cost-sharing arrangement could be negotiated with the homeowners; otherwise, just maintain the status quo. Any change in the status quo needs to be fair to the residents who live on the private roads, as well as to those whose tax burden could be affected and do not.

Masters: Many of the roads may be too narrow to be classified as public roads. After a thorough investigation of ownership, there should be a maintenance plan  established. For those roads determined to be under the jurisdiction of the town  or still in question, I recommend exploring the scenic road option road for those very narrow roads which do not meet town standards. This would minimize cost, preserve neighborhoods and allow repairs to proceed.

The budget approved last spring was $124.5 million, a 1.5% spending increase that required a 1% tax increase. What are reasonable amounts for next year’s town and school budgets? Where should town should spend more or less?

Manners: Many people in town, possibly more than last year, are suffering from the continued recession and high unemployment. It is incumbent upon the BOS to keep taxes as low as possible while adequately addressing the health, safety, and welfare of our residents and the town’s future. Re the schools’ budget: It is up to the BOE to give us a number and for us then to make a recommendation after reviewing the essential needs of all town departments. Clearly our roads need maintenance and our emergency services need well-functioning equipment. These are the first priorities re town operations.

Kozlark: During these difficult economic times, we need to send to the voters a budget that maintains our town’s strong financial condition and also provides the level of town and school services that those voters require. As a community, we cannot stand still. We must develop a budget that supports controlled improvement and growth. This can be achieved through tough contract negotiations and finding maximum efficiencies in all operations. We need to make the thoughtful decisions. And we need to remember that Ridgefield is our home and the quality of life that brought us here must be preserved.

Rifkinson: Budgets have many moving parts. To quote “reasonable” budget numbers now would be a politically driven guessing game which is not my forte.

However, this important question should be asked and answered before labor negotiations begin, not before an election. That’s because three-quarters of our entire budget consists of labor costs. And to improve those numbers, I believe the entire negotiating process should be revamped so all labor negotiations are  performed exclusively by a professional labor relations firm.

Currently, I am not persuaded that we budget efficiently. Until I am, I will be skeptical at budget time.

Bodner: The economy is worse, taxes are higher, state aid to Ridgefield is lower, and long-term prospects for Connecticut are bleak – I think the goal for this year should be the same as last year, a 1% or less property tax increase. How the additional dollars, if any, are divided between the town and school budgets will depend on the priorities that are developed from the budgeting process.

The town cannot continue to neglect its infrastructure needs, which means a commitment to annually pave roads, repair roofs, and insure that essential emergency equipment is maintained and replaced as needed.

Masters: Each year the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Education present the town and school budgets respectively, which each board believes meets the needs of Ridgefield. Ultimately the responsibility for setting the size of each budget falls to the Board of Finance. The Board of Finance monitors tax receipts, projects future tax receipts, and weighs the ability of the taxpayers to absorb any tax increases. I have always viewed my job as selectman not to set the size of the budget but to balance the needs of all Ridgefielders, as much as  possible, while living within our means.

Campaign TV Appearance > After funny opening monologue, move slider to 32 minutes for my segment

Why vote for an unaffiliated candidate?

Written by Jan Rifkinson
Monday, 07 November 2011 05:26

 

Who am I, what do I stand for, why am I campaigning for a seat on the Board of Selectmen?

I’m a retired, middle class married guy living on a fixed income, financially squeezed like many of you.

Philosophically, I’m for transparency in government, full disclosure and working more closely with Ridgefielders.

Fiscally, I’m careful. I want to understand the reasons for spending and exactly how that spending will benefit the taxpayer. I believe more revenue streams must be developed to reduce the tax burden.

People move here not only for our excellent schools, but because both housing and taxes are lower by comparison to other Fairfield towns in our category. If that formula changes, Ridgefield’s charm will change. I am not in favor of that.

I love new ideas. I like to converse with people. I admire thoughtful individuals with common sense.

I am not politically driven, which is why I made a conscious decision to run as an unaffiliated candidate.

Demagoguery, dogma and political gamesmanship don’t belong in Ridgefield.

Someone willing to volunteer their time for the community, running for a seat on the Board of Selectmen as I am, should understand the town’s major issues. I attended almost all board meetings for the past four years and I can say that I am knowledgeable about those issues.

If I am elected, I may not always get it right, but I’m sure going to do my best to balance the interests of everyone in the entire community.

Press endorsements in election

Written by The Ridgefield Press
Monday, 07 November 2011 05:29

Ridgefielders are lucky to have more than 30 candidates — Republicans, Democrats, an unaffiliated voter — running for office on Nov. 8, including 23 in five contested races. It takes concern and courage to run: hats off to them all.

Ridgefield is great place, and doing remarkably well considering how tough the economic times are — a 1% tax increase last year. The four incumbents on the Board of Selectmen deserve re-election: two Democrats, Barbara Manners, who has done so much for the arts and to enrich community life in town, and Di Masters, the community center director and a former Planning and Zoning chair; and two Republicans, Andy Bodner, the board’s house skeptic and numbers man, and Maureen Kozlark, the moderate longtime school board veteran.

That said, Jan Rifkinson, the unaffiliated petitioning candidate, deserves credit and the town’s thanks for making a contest of it and running a clean issue-oriented campaign. [...]

The Numbers > 2011 Town Elections

First Selectman	Total
Rudy Marconi (D)	3552

Board of Selectmen	Total
Di Masters (D)	2786
Barbara Manners (D)	2936
Andrew Bodner (R)	3085
Maureen Kozlark (R)	2866
Jan Rifkinson (U)	1324

Town Clerk	Total
Barbara Serfilippi (R)	3537

Town Treasurer	Total
Maureen Kiernan (R)	3498

Tax Collector	Total
Jane Berendsen-Hill (R)	3256

Board of Finance	Total
Jessica Mancini (D)	2798
Steven Coury (R)	1866
Paul Sutherland (D)	2331
John Palermo (R)	2253
David Ulmer (D)	2638

Board of Education	Total
Adeline Merrill (D)	2468
Linda Lavelle (R)	2335
Karen Sulzinsky (D)	2549
Michael Raduazzo (R)	2554
Richard Steinhart (R)	2824
Austin Drukker (R)	2945
Christopher Murray (R)	2474

Board of Assessment Appeals	Total
Robert Lavelle (R)	2656

Planning and Zoning	Total
Philip Mische (D)	2747
Peter Chipouras (R)	2856
Patrick Walsh (R)	3124
John Katz (R)	2952
George Hanlon (R) 2 years	3040

Zoning Board of Appeals (5 years, 2011)	Total
Duane C. Barney (R)	2862

Zoning Board of Appeals (5 years, 2012)	Total
Sky Cole (D)	1588
David J. Choplinski (R)	2022

Zoning Board of Appeals (One year)	Total
David J. Choplinski (R)	2413

Zoning Board of Appeals (5 years, 2011)	Total
Sky Cole (D)	1247
Michael S. Stenko (R)	2125

Zoning Board of Appeals (Four years)	Total
Sky Cole (D)	1698

Police Commissioners	Total
Joseph I. Adams, Jr. (D)	1493
Charles A. Knoche (R)	2738
George F. Cain (D)	2597

 

Faint praise from the opposition > A valid candidate says Susan Coco

No challenge for top spot in Ridgefield

Robert Miller, Staff Writer

Updated 11:35 p.m., Friday, November 4, 2011

RIDGEFIELD -- Even in Connecticut, the Land of Steady Habits, this town is the soul of political stability.

It votes on the top town officials only every four years, rather than every two years. And this year, when the Republicans had a chance to challenge First Selectman Rudy Marconi after his 12 years in office, they chose to pass.

Marconi is running unopposed, ensuring he'll be first selectman until at least 2015.

Nor did the Republicans even try to pick up a third seat on the Board of Selectmen. Instead, the four incumbents -- Democrats Di Masters and Barbara Manners and Republicans Andrew Bodnar and Maureen Kozlark -- are facing their only challenge from petitioning candidate Jan Rifkinson.

Rifkinson said he finds the lack of competition in town "pretty distressing.'' His candidacy, he said, offers the voters at least one choice in the selectmen's race.

"When you serve too long, the knife can get a little dull,'' he said of the incumbents.

Democratic Town Chairman Susan Cocco called Rifkinson a valid candidate.

"He's certainly on the ballot," she said. But Cocco then quickly praised Marconi and the four selectmen, Democrats and Republicans alike, saying they offer the town proven leadership. [...]

Tribute to Truman > Campaign Bus 2011